For larger volumes of sales, you'll need Professional to stay compliant, but that's a simple upgrade for the difference in purchase price and it applies to all previously generated images. If the sale is small enough, then it's allowed under the detailed terms of the Personal license. Regarding sale of photos, the licensing terms are not intended to present a problem.
#ZERENE STACKER VS PHOTOSHOP FOR FREE#
In our case, we can't afford to give it away for free to anybody, but the Student and Personal prices are a lot less than Professional. One feature that may not be immediately evident: a powerful retouching capability is provided at all levels of Zerene Stacker, but in Helicon Focus only in Pro.Ībout pricing, the policy for Zerene Stacker is similar in concept to many other software packages that are free for noncommercial purposes but require a license for commercial use. You might also be interested in the various postings and articles published by Michael Erlewine.
A wide range of issues is discussed at length in the forums there, and the shift in usage from Helicon to Zerene over time has been striking. Thank you for contacting us by email and pointing us to this thread.įor in-depth technical comparison of Helicon Focus and Zerene Stacker, I'll point you to Yet for the possibility I might sell some, I have to shell out more $$. Although, I don't currently sell many photos, in the future I may. Their site indicates the professional version is for those who sells photos? What? I am really confused why the differentiate that way. Professional version is much more than the personal version. Also, is helicon lite adequate for most images?Īlso curious about Zerene's pricing. Just curious on anybody's experience with Zerene vs helicon focus.
0 kommentar(er)
